No reason to bo so rude … I am posting what I have observed - and I am not a newbie here …been using Axure since I think version 7 or so.
and I noticed a distinct difference in version 10 - that others in my design group have also noticed - and one difference is how repeaters are handled. It is more tied to the .csv file - and automatically creates one for you instead of you having to do that manually as you might not need that for your repeater. (Now that I am thinking of it - I think it was actually v8 that I am thinking of it - I believe I skipped v9 and went right to 10)
So - in version 8 - when you had a repeater going you could click into any text or image component and edit just that instance of the repeater element without it repeating for all the elements of that kind - like one of the images in this example…
– for example - if I want this image to be different for each instance in the repeater - I think I can do that programmatically - though I haven’t had that working - but in the past I could also do that manually and say I want to edit this image for this instance of the element and not have all images change to what I said - but just for that one. (and also you will notice it created the spreadsheet with the text - that I would not have created one for it - as I might not need the full spreadsheet if my repeater is only say 4 items. ---- i imagine that it is perhaps just being more transparent to show how things will be stored in the backend so that it can manage it . it is just rather annoying that it won’t let you edit text in context vs just in that spreadsheet - at least I haven’t seen it do that in 10 - where I could easily do that in 8.
So now that I am thinking about it - it was probably version 8 where I could click into a repeater and edit the element individually for individual instances within the repeater - and not for all of those elements repeated… not sure how to do that in version 10 - THAT is my question - hopefully the examples explain it better.
It would also be really great if you could break up contents of a repeater so they become their own elements and not tied to the whole set to do more fine tuning which is not really easy to do in a repeater (but that is a whole other topic)…